USPTO serial 88503257
FLEX-BODY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLEX-BODY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Kunin
Peter Kunin DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STREET, PO BOX 190BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Structural parts for dump truck bodies, semi-dump trailers, dump trucks and tipper truck bodies, namely, modular sub-assemblies comprised of adjustable screws and bolts, cast steel, aluminum brass bushings, hoists and hinges of metal for opening tailgates and adjusting tailgate height, latches, and gate locks, all of the foregoing excluding seats and seat cushions and excluding systems for seats or seat cushions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 5, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |