USPTO serial 88505822
VUE360
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZARICK, DIANA G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VUE360?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bowling Green, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Irene Y. Lee
IRENE Y. LEE RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD, 12TH FL.LOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | motion sensitive security lights; security lights for outdoor use; home automation hubs comprised of voice-activated speakers, computer hardware, and downloadable software for controlling networked devices in the internet of things (IoT), operating internet-enabled and connected lighting apparatus and home security alarms; electric door bells; electronic video surveillance products, namely, electronic components of security systems; residential entrance door video monitoring system comprising a camera for transmitting images to a remote location; residential entrance door video monitoring system comprising a microphone, a speaker, a doorbell, and a camera for transmitting images to a remote location; residential doorbell camera units; wireless residential entrance door video transmission device; downloadable software and software applications permitting users to identify and communicate with persons at their residential entrance door; downloadable applications for monitoring a user's residential entrance door, for use over the internet and mobile devices; computer software for connecting residential entrance door doorbells with mobile phones and handheld computers; light systems comprising light sensors and switches; electronic security systems for activating a lighting system in response to a change in the environmental in a predetermined space; comprising light sensors and switches; outdoor decorative video lighting; proximity motion sensors; universal add-on video accessories to existing security or decorative lighting; solar-powered security lighting; solar-powered security connected lighting; battery-powered security lighting; battery-powered security connected lighting | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | light bulbs; lighting fixtures; lighting fixtures with motion detection; luminaries; wall lights; lamp bulbs; LED (light emitting diode) lighting fixtures; LED lamps; LED lighting systems, namely, LED modules, power supplies, and wiring; video doorbells; outdoor decorative lighting; outdoor decorative connected lighting; landscape lighting; connected landscape lighting; solar-powered decorative lighting; solar-powered decorative connected lighting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |