Drawing for ARCHITEK

USPTO serial 88507920

ARCHITEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRELL, LUCY K
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCHITEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sandra Epp Ryan

Sandra Epp Ryan HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C.45 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 2700MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Semiconductor parts, namely, semiconductor chips, semiconductor microprocessors, semiconductor processor chips, large scale integration (LSI) semiconductor integrated circuits, semiconductor integrated circuit chips for processing artificial intelligence (AI) and images and videos, semiconductor devices and microprocessors; electronic circuits; integrated circuits; large scale integrated circuits; downloadable computer programs for processing digital image, Artificial Intelligence (AI) training, detecting Artificial Intelligence (AI), classifying Artificial Intelligence (AI), inferencing Edge Artificial Intelligence (AI), developing computer vision, operating parallel processing, detecting simultaneous localization and mapping applications in the field of autonomous driving, security, and inspection; semiconductors; computer hardwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 10, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2022EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 4, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 26, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 20, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 20, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 20, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 3, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 16, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 12, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 7, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 7, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 4, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2019TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jul 16, 2019PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance