USPTO serial 88510595
GALLOPING GOOSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GANESH, HARINI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GALLOPING GOOSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. MICHAEL DRUMM
H. MICHAEL DRUMM DRUMM LAW LLC14656 W. 56TH DR.ARVADA, CO 80002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Distilled spirits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |