USPTO serial 88513139
PROXICOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROXICOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Feigin, Esq.
Michael J. Feigin, Esq. Feigin and Fridman LLC1037 Rt 46 East, Suite 107Clifton, NJ 07013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software in the fields of railway maintenance and construction worker monitoring and safety, train traffic monitoring, and train traffic proximity alerts; electronic signaling mechanisms, namely, a train location monitoring system used in the railway industry for detecting and locating trains, and for alerting railway workers of any trains coming into close proximity; telematics apparatus, namely, wireless devices worn by railway maintenance and construction worker to provide telematic services and train proximity alerts | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring software in the fields of railway maintenance and construction worker monitoring and safety, train traffic monitoring, and train traffic proximity alerts; Retail store services featuring train location monitoring systems; Retail store services featuring telematics apparatus, namely, wireless devices worn by railway maintenance and construction worker to provide telematic services and train proximity alerts | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telematic transmission of information in the nature of safety alerts and updates transmitted to railway maintenance and construction workers regarding trains coming into close proximity | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | monitoring of safety alert systems to warn individuals of approaching railway trains | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Willowglen Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named PROXICOM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |