USPTO serial 88515669
QLDELP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 610
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PILARO, MARK F
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QLDELP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Xiamen Fujian, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Bathrobes; Coats; Jacket liners; Leather belts; Running shoes; Shawls; Shirt-jacs; Ski gloves; Skirt suits; Soccer shoes; Sports shoes; Stocking hats; Underwear; Vest extenders; Knitted baby shoes; Travel clothing contained in a package comprising reversible jackets, pants, skirts, tops and a belt or scarf | TERMINATED | Jun 10, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2022 | KNOT | NOTICE OF TERMINATION – EMAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | KBOC | TERMINATED AFTER SANCTIONS | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | KONO | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS - NOTICE EMAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | KOFS | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | KSNR | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - PENDING SCO | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | KSAD | SUSPENDED PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | KSCO | SHOW CAUSE ORDER | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |