USPTO serial 88516272
PRO FOOTBALL ADVISORY BOARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRO FOOTBALL ADVISORY BOARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Verdini
CHRISTOPHER M. VERDINI K&L GATES LLP210 SIXTH AVENUEK&L GATES CENTERPITTSBURGH, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing a website that displays requests, reviews, recommendations, rankings, votes, polls and surveys for users in the field of football; providing a website featuring information in the field of football; providing an internet website portal in the field of football; non-downloadable electronic publications, in the nature of blogs, podcasts, surveys, polls, newsletters and videos in the field of football; Providing a website for conducting polls and surveys and providing and receiving feedback from users in the field of football; Publication and presentation of reviews, polls, surveys, recommendations and ratings and providing interactive websites and computer applications for the posting and sharing of reviews, surveys, recommendations and ratings relating to football; Website and online portal for providing information, news and commentary in the field of football whereby users can vote, rate and comment on the football items posted; Computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for users to search for and participate in discussions and surveys, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, and engage in social networking services in the field of football; Downloadable software in the nature of mobile applications for displaying information relating to reviews, recommendations, rankings, votes, polls and surveys for users in the field of football; Downloadable software in the nature of mobile applications to enable users search for, post and access information relating to football; Downloadable software in the nature of mobile applications for conducting surveys and polls; Downloadable computer software in the nature of mobile applications for posting, sharing, linking, storing, tagging, uploading, downloading, accessing, displaying, editing, modifying, organizing, or otherwise providing electronic media and information via the internet and communication networks in the field of football; downloadable computer software in the nature of mobile application software to enable users to participate in discussions, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, form virtual private communities, and engage in social and community networking in the field of football; Online social networking services provided through a football community website; Online social networking services in the field of football | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |