USPTO serial 88516411
CONNEXTHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONNEXTHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montréal, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles G. Zug
Charles G. Zug NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP301 S. College St.Suite 2300, IP DepartmentCharlotte, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for the extraction, collection, organizing, analyzing, processing, and storage of data and information in the field of asset management in manufacturing; downloadable computer software for building reports, charts, graphs, and digital dashboards in the field of manufacturing and test and measurement; downloadable computer software for database management and data analytics; downloadable computer software for searching and querying data, information and databases in the field of manufacturing and test and measurement; downloadable computer software for integrating, monitoring, tracking, analyzing and providing feedback on automated test equipment data; downloadable computer software for managing product-manufacturing information that allows product designers and manufacturers to author, manage, report, react to, and improve test and measurement activities, supply-chain and assembly activities, quality control, and communications, covering one or all stages of the product lifecycle, from product design and validation through manufacturing and repair and returns screening | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training services in the field of use of computer software for testing product quality and manufacturing processes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Manufacturing test system services, namely, the development of computer test platforms that comprise hardware, firmware and software, allowing manufacturers to monitor, manage, report, react to and improve manufacturing test and measurement activities, assembly activities and communications, covering one or all stages of the product lifecycle, from product design and validation through manufacturing and repair and returns screening; Development of software platforms that allow manufacturers of products to author, manage, report, react to and improve test and measurement activities, assembly activities and communications, covering one or all stages of the product lifecycle, from product design and validation through manufacturing and repair and returns screening; Test and measurement services, namely, designing test software and hardware platforms used in the development and testing of real-time embedded systems and measurement systems; Development of software in the field of test and measurement; Computer software architecture design, software development, system engineering, namely, computer systems engineering services, test automation, namely, automating test software and equipment by limiting human manipulation on a production line, project management services, and system validation, namely, validating the quality of the test software and equipment in the field of test and measurement; Computer software design, design of graphical user interfaces; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for simplifying the implementation and maintenance of software; Software as a service (SAAS), featuring computer software for the extraction, collection, organizing, analyzing, processing, and storage of data and information in the field of asset management in manufacturing; software as a service (SAAS), featuring computer software for building reports, charts, graphs, and digital dashboards in the field of asset management in manufacturing; software as a service (SAAS), featuring computer software for asset management; software as a service (SAAS), featuring computer software for searching and querying data, information and databases in the field of asset management in manufacturing; software as a service (SAAS), featuring computer software for integrating, monitoring, tracking, analyzing and providing feedback on automated test equipment data; software as a service (SAAS), featuring computer software for managing product-manufacturing information that allows product designers and manufacturers to author, manage, report, react to, and improve test and measurement activities, supply-chain and assembly activities, quality control, and communications, covering one or all stages of the product lifecycle, from product design and validation through manufacturing and repair/returns screening; Test data management of product quality, processes and operations, namely, compiling and analyzing data extracted from production line tests and repair centers in the field of testing product quality, processes and operations; Data analytics services, namely, collection of data using proprietary software to analyze and evaluate product quality | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 26, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |