Drawing for EVOLUTION

USPTO serial 88518062

EVOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HISER, CHARLES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel E. Kattman

Daniel E. Kattman REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN S.C.1000 N. WATER STREETSuite 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045licensing high performance cars for use in motion pictures, television programming and other mediaACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 21, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 21, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 21, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 27, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 21, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 21, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 21, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 21, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 21, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 11, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 11, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 6, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 4, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 30, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 6, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 6, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 6, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 15, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 14, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 14, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 23, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 20, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance