USPTO serial 88518979
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Reykjavik, IS
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Stewart
David J. Stewart Alston & Bird1201 West Peachtree StreetAtlanta, GA 30309UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for interpreting fingerprints or palm prints; Computer software for biometric systems for the identification and authentication of persons; Biometric identification systems comprised of computer software and systems for identifying individuals based on their biometric characteristics; Authentication software for identification and verification of individuals and legal entities | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Corporate identity services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Issuing of electronic identity documents to individuals for the purpose of enabling businesses to verify customer identities | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Internet security consultancy; Research in the field of data processing technology; Research in the field of information technology; Authentication of pictures; Information technology consulting services; Consultancy in the field of data security; Design and development of electronic data security systems; Design and development of data storage systems; Development and testing of computing methods, algorithms and software; Computer security services in the nature of providing authentication of user identities; Providing user authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications; Providing user authentication services using biometric hardware and software technology for e-commerce transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring of security systems to prevent unauthorized access; Opening of door locks; Opening of security locks; Personal background investigations; Pre-employment background screening; Pre-employment background investigation services; Security services for the protection of individuals and property, namely, providing identity verification services to prevent unauthorized access to computer systems; Identity verification services, namely, verification of personal identity to prevent unauthorized access to computer systems; Identity validation services, namely, validation of personal identity to prevent unauthorized access to computer systems; Providing authentication of personal identification information to prevent unauthorized access to computer systems; Providing background check services, namely, background investigation services; Monitoring of computer systems for security purposes to prevent unauthorized access | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |