Drawing for A ARGO AI

USPTO serial 88521218

A ARGO AI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A ARGO AI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David V. Radack

David V. Radack ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC600 GRANT STREET, 44TH FLOORPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable and/or recorded computer software for self-driving vehicles for enhancing the design of autonomous vehicles, monitoring the functionality and operating features of self-driving vehicles, and improving safety; and computer hardware for use by vehicle manufacturers in the field of self-driving vehicle technologyACTIVE—
037Installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware in the field of self-driving vehicle technologyACTIVE—
042Scientific research and development in the field of self-driving vehicle technology; product research and development in the field of self-driving vehicle technology; engineering design services provided to vehicle manufacturers in the field of self-driving vehicle technology; consulting services provided to vehicle manufacturers in the field of engineering in the field of self-driving vehicle technology; computer hardware and software design and development for vehicle manufacturers in the field of self-driving vehicle technology; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software in the field of self-driving vehicle technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 25, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance