USPTO serial 88525073
PIVOT-WORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, MICHAEL J.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIVOT-WORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Consulting services about education; consulting services in the field of career advancement; consulting services in the field of competency based assessment; consulting services in the field of prior learning assessment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Information technology IT consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Personal growth and motivation consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 6, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |