USPTO serial 88527808
THE GOOD DISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE GOOD DISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; soups, namely, meat and vegetable soups | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Sep 26, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |