USPTO serial 88528302
CBD AUTHORITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRIZANT, JAMES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CBD AUTHORITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | Feb 7, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2022 | ABN8 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PETITION DECISION(IU CASE) | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 1, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |