Drawing for DAPHNE OZ

USPTO serial 88529750

DAPHNE OZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAPHNE OZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SHAUNA M. WERTHEIM

SHAUNA M. WERTHEIM THE MARBURY LAW GROUP, PLLC11800 SUNRISE VALLEY DRIVE15TH FLOORRESTON, VA 20191

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Bedding, namely, bed sheets, pillow cases, pillow shams, mattress covers, bedspreads, coverlets, comforters, quilts, duvet covers, duvets, dust ruffles, and pillow covers; blankets, namely, bed blankets, household blanket throws, children's blankets, blanket throws, bed throws, and blankets for outdoor use; towelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 13, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 13, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 28, 2021EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 21, 2021RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Mar 30, 2021GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2021GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2021CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 4, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 4, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 30, 2020RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Jul 30, 2020RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2020RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jul 8, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 8, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2020ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 7, 2020OTHECASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION—
Apr 7, 2020IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jan 28, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 3, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 9, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance