USPTO serial 88530654
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Nabor
Joseph T. Nabor FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY, LLP120 S. LASALLE STREETSUITE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60603| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Testing facilities for electric grid simulation and interoperability of power equipment, namely, testing and measuring equipment for use in testing the performance and efficiency of power transmission equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Electric grid simulation, namely, computer simulation based on computer programs for others; and testing interoperability of power equipment, namely, testing of power apparatus in the field of electrical engineering | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |