Drawing for DRYPO

USPTO serial 88531552

DRYPO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRYPO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shiyong Ye

250 W 34th StreetOne Penn Plaza, Suite 2015New York, NY 10119

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018All-purpose athletic bags; Back packs; Backpacks; Book bags; Briefcases; Briefcases for documents; Card wallets; Crossbody bags; Duffel bags; Duffel bags for travel; Handbags; Handbags for ladies; Key-cases; Keycases; Leather bags and wallets; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Leather straps; Leather shoulder straps; Trunks being luggage; Trunks being luggage and suitcases; Waist bags; Wallets including card holders; All-purpose leather straps; Backpacks, book bags, sports bags, bum bags, wallets and handbags; Evening handbags; Fashion handbags; Folding briefcases; Gentlemen's handbags; Leather briefcases; Leather handbags; Leather credit card wallets; Sack packs, namely, drawstring bags used as backpacks; School book bags; Slouch handbagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 17, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 13, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 26, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 28, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 16, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 16, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 31, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance