USPTO serial 88531788
OGIBOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 610
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JANSON, ANDREW KYLE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OGIBOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jianou,Fujian, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Baby rattles; Bath toys; Battery operated action toys; Construction toys; Dog toys; Fishing tackle; Flying saucers; Novelty noisemaker toys for parties; Pet toys; Plastic character toys; Stuffed toy animals; Stuffed toys; Toy robots; Toy stuffed animals; Toy vehicles | TERMINATED | May 12, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2023 | KNOT | NOTICE OF TERMINATION – EMAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | KBOC | TERMINATED AFTER SANCTIONS | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | KONO | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS - NOTICE EMAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | KOFS | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | KSNS | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | KSAD | SUSPENDED PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |