USPTO serial 88531992
ORDERREADY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SABAGH, LAILA TAREK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORDERREADY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Kim
26791 Aliso Creek Rd. #1016Aliso Viejo, CA 92656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile applications for use in advertising and marketing by means of indirect methods of marketing communications, namely, social media marketing, search engine marketing, inquiry marketing, internet marketing, mobile marketing, and marketing via blogging and other forms of passive, sharable or viral communications channels; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for enabling customers to manage and track pickup and delivery goods in transit; Downloadable augmented reality software for use in mobile devices for integrating electronic data with real world environments for the purpose of engaging and coordinating order pick up services and delivery services involving third-party restaurants, mobile vendors, and businesses with any product for purchase; downloadable computer software for providing information concerning pickup and delivery of goods in transit; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for engaging and coordinating order pick up services and delivery services involving third-party restaurants, mobile vendors, and businesses with any product for purchase, computer software for providing information concerning pickup and delivery of goods in transit; Downloadable computer software, namely, software development tools for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interfaces; Downloadable computer software, namely, an electronic financial platform that accommodates multiple types of payment and debt transactions in an integrated mobile phone, PDA, and web-based environment; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, handheld computers, mobile notebooks, namely, software for planning, scheduling, controlling, monitoring, and providing information on transportation of goods in transit or being prepared for pick up | ACTIVE | Oct 12, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2024 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |