USPTO serial 88532239
PVIXFG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 610
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PVIXFG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Lunch-boxes; Lunch boxes made of metal; Lunch boxes made of plastic; Plate glass for cars; Trays for domestic purposes of paper; Trays of paper, for household purposes; Baseball plate brushes; Finger bowls; Ground plate glass; Mixing bowls; Polished plate glass; Rinsing bowls; Salad bowls; Smoothed plate glass; Trifle bowls | TERMINATED | Jun 23, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2022 | KNOT | NOTICE OF TERMINATION – EMAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | KBOC | TERMINATED AFTER SANCTIONS | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | KONO | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS - NOTICE EMAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | KOFS | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |