USPTO serial 88532337
MANYZD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 610
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATT, JAIME L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MANYZD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jianou,Fujian, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Baby rattles; Bath toys; Battery operated action toys; Construction toys; Dog toys; Dolls; Fishing tackle; Flying saucers; Knee guards for athletic use; Novelty noisemaker toys for parties; Pet toys; Plastic character toys; Stuffed toy animals; Stuffed toy bears; Stuffed toys; Stuffed and plush toys; Toy robots; Toy stuffed animals; Toy vehicles | TERMINATED | Jul 11, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2023 | KNOT | NOTICE OF TERMINATION – EMAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2023 | KBOC | TERMINATED AFTER SANCTIONS | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | KONO | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS - NOTICE EMAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | KOFS | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | KSNS | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | KSAD | SUSPENDED PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 31, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |