USPTO serial 88533207
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Calgary, Alberta, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Becker
Jeffrey M. Becker HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP2323 VICTORY AVENUE, SUITE 700DALLAS, TX 75219UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software and downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software that allows users to place and pay for orders with local merchants, restaurants, bars, cafes and stores, and allows local merchants, restaurants, bars, cafes and stores to disseminate promotions and deals to users of the computer application | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing websites featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software, namely, software for use in facilitating the advertising and marketing of restaurants to consumers, for accessing restaurant menus, for placing restaurant orders, for monitoring the status and/or location of restaurant orders, and for restaurants to manage customer order information | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |