USPTO serial 88534264
BLU & FLOYD BY DAVID BABAII
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLU & FLOYD BY DAVID BABAII?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAX ALVAREZ
DAX ALVAREZ SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 EAST VAN BUREN STREETSUITE 1900PHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated shampoos; hair conditioners; hair texturizers; skin refreshers in the nature of skin toners; skin and hair lotions; skin and hair cremes; hair rinses; and skin and hair emollients; all of the foregoing for or use on or with animals; fragrance sprays and urine stain remover; cleaning agents and preparations for household purposes; pet fragrances | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Vitamins, dietary and nutritional supplements for pets; medicated pet products, namely, medicated shampoos, medicated hair conditioners, medicated skin and hair lotions, medicated skin and hair cremes, medicated skin and hair emollients | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Dog clippers; electric and battery-powered hair clippers; electric animal nail grinders; electric hair clippers; electric hair trimmers; electric nail clippers; electric razors and electric hair clippers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cair by David Cosmetics Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named BLU & FLOYD BY DAVID BABAII
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |