USPTO serial 88534274
CAIR BY DAVID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAIR BY DAVID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAX ALVAREZ
DAX ALVAREZ SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 EAST VAN BUREN STREETSUITE 1900PHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Electric flat irons; electric hair curling irons; electric hair straightening irons; crimping irons; depilation appliances; hand tools, namely, electric hand-held hair weaving implements; eyelash curlers; hair care instruments, namely, non-Electric curling irons, curling tongs, tweezers, hair cutting scissors, hair clippers and hair trimmers; nail care instruments and apparatus, namely, electric and non-electric nail files, cuticle nippers, nail nippers, nail clippers in the nature of nail extractors for extracting fingernails and toenails, manicure sets, pedicure sets; razors | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Facial rolling massagers and massagers for cosmetic purposes in the nature of electric and electromechanical vibrating massagers, and manual dermarollers, namely, microneedle dermal rollers; cosmetic apparatus using ultrasound for performing aesthetic skin treatment procedures; cosmetic apparatus, namely, light based devices providing mainly pulsed light for performing non-ablative aesthetic skin treatment procedures; electrically-powered apparatus for treating skin by applying low level light and sonic vibrations to the skin; electronic light therapy apparatus for the skin; lasers for the cosmetic treatment of the face and skin; light emitting devices, namely, lamps and led devices for treatment of a variety of skin conditions; massage apparatus; medical apparatus for measuring skin hydration; microdermabrasion apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Hair dryers; hair dryer diffusers; hand-held electric hair dryers; hair steamers for beauty salon use; hair drying machines for beauty salon use; hair dryers for household purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Hair brushes and combs; cosmetic brushes; cosmetic applicators, namely, foam applicator sticks for applying cosmetics; puffs, namely, body scrubbing puffs and powder puffs; bath sponges; facial sponge for applying make-up; eyebrow and eyelash brushes and combs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cair by David Cosmetics Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named CAIR BY DAVID
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |