USPTO serial 88535357
IEHOTTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YI, CRYSTAL HAEIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IEHOTTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wei Yang
245 Meadow Pine PlSan Jose, CA 95125UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Appliances for removing make-up, electric; Appliances for removing make-up, non-electric; Applicator sticks for applying make-up; Applicators sold empty for applying cosmetic lotions for skin, hair, face; Bakeware; Baking mats; Battery-powered applicators for applying cosmetics to eyelashes; Bottle openers, electric and non-electric; Bowls; Caddies for holding cosmetics, cleaning brushes for household use; Cake molds; Chocolate molds; Cleaning cotton; Cocktail shakers; Combs; Cookery molds; Cookie molds; Cooking pots; Cooking spoons; Cooking utensils, namely, grills; Cosmetic brushes; Cosmetic spatulas; Cosmetic spatulas for use with depilatory preparations; Crumb-sweepers; Cupcake molds; Fitted vanity cases; Garbage cans; Gardening gloves; Glass carafes; Glass jars; Household utensils, namely, ovenware, bakeware, comal; Japanese cast iron kettles, non-electric (tetsubin); Jugs; Kettles, non-electric; Kitchen containers; Knife rests for the table; Make-up brushes; Microdermabrasion sponges for cosmetic use; Non-electric carpet sweepers; Non-electric kettles; Ovenware; Pitchers; Plates; Porcelain cake decorations; Porcelain flower pots; Porcelain mugs; Pots; Shoe brushes; Shoe polish applicators not containing shoe polish; Shoe polishing mitts; Shoe shine cloths; Tea sets; Thermally insulated containers for food; Toothbrushes; Wine glasses; Wine jugs; Wine pourers | ACTIVE | Jun 20, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2021 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |