USPTO serial 88536019
FREDDY HIRSCH PRIMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALAO, OREOLUWA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREDDY HIRSCH PRIMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William G. Giltinan
William G. Giltinan CARLTON FIELDS, PAPO BOX 3239ATTN: IP DEPT.TAMPA, FL 33601-3239Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online retail and wholesale store services featuring chemical and organic compositions for use in the manufacture of food, food ingredients and food processing machines, parts and accessories; online ordering services featuring chemical and organic compositions for use in the manufacture of food, food ingredients and food processing machines, parts and accessories; sales promotion through customer loyalty programs; organization, operation and supervision of loyalty and incentive schemes, namely, administration of consumer loyalty programs; remote monitoring services of food processing machines and apparatus for business purposes, namely, royalty audit purposes and financial audit purposes; monitoring of food processing machines and apparatus for business purposes, namely, royalty audit purposes and financial audit purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair, installation and maintenance services relating to food processing machines and apparatus; provision of technical support, namely, technical advice concerning the installation, repair and/or maintenance of food processing machines and apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical services, namely, consulting and mechanical engineering services relating to food processing machines and apparatus; remote monitoring services of food processing machines and apparatus for quality control purposes and process optimization purposes; computer diagnostic services of food processing machines and apparatus; data acquisition and collection for calibration and coordinate-measurement purposes of food processing machines and apparatus; monitoring of food processing machines and apparatus for quality control purposes and process optimization purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Freddy Hirsch Group AG
- Other trademarks owned by Freddy Hirsch Group AG
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FREDDY HIRSCH PRIMO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |