Drawing for CORAZON SANGRANTE

USPTO serial 88536224

CORAZON SANGRANTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CORAZON SANGRANTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. David Starr

H. David Starr Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato Road, Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages excluding beer and wine; alcoholic corn-based beverages not for food purposes, namely, chicha and jora chicha; monkey tail, being a mixed cocktail containing rum; masato, being a yucca based alcoholic drink; pulque, being a maguey plant based alcoholic drink; raicilla, being an agave based alcoholic drink; sabajon, being a rum based drink similar to eggnog; tepache being a pineapple based alcoholic drink; xtabentun being an anise liqueur; mint liquor; amargos being an agave based alcoholic drink; anisette; distilled beverages, namely, mezcal; hard ciders; prepared alcoholic cocktails; curacao; spirits; brandy; sake; whiskey; alcoholic essences; alcoholic extracts; alcoholic beverages containing fruits; rice alcohol; rum; vodka; pre-mixed alcoholic beverages not being based on beer; nira; baijiu; rompope being a rum based drink similar to eggnog; vermouthACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 6, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 6, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 5, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 16, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance