USPTO serial 88536653
GIRLS WHO BREW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NASSERGHODSI, SAHAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GIRLS WHO BREW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul D. Supnik
PAUL D. SUPNIK LAW OFFICE OF PAUL D. SUPNIK9401 WILSHIRE BLVD., STE 1250BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Tops, bottoms, t-shirts, tank tops, caps, shirts, scarves, headbands, sweatshirts, jackets, aprons | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Beverages made of tea; sparkling beverages made of tea; organically grown tea bags made from primarily organic ingredients; beverages made of coffee | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 032 | Beer, flavored beer, beer based beverages; brewed beverage making kits; Carbonated soft drinks; bottled drinking water; flavored drinking water; soda water; lemonade; sparkling water and non-alcoholic cocktail mixes; fruit juices, fruit beverages; non-alcoholic sparking tea based beverages; non-alcoholic sparkling coffee based beverages; vinegar based soda beverages | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring specialty cheeses, charcuterie, jams, olive oils, sandwiches, crackers, bread, prepared foods, tea and tea-related goods, coffee and coffee-related goods and other gourmet specialty food items and kitchenware; On-line retail store services featuring specialty cheeses, charcuterie, jams, olive oils, sandwiches, crackers, bread, prepared foods, tea and tea-related goods, coffee and coffee-related goods and other gourmet specialty food items and kitchenware | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 036 | Charitable services, namely, providing grants to support third party educational and charitable organizations and causes | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | Organizing, arranging and conducting events in the field of foods and beverages | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ENROOT ORGANICS PBC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GIRLS WHO BREW
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |