USPTO serial 88537310
URBANDEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with URBANDEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MEMPHIS, TN
Cordova, TN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Handbag frames; Handbag organizer inserts specially adapted to handbags; Handbags; Handbags for ladies; Handbags for men; Handbags incorporating RFID blocking technology; Handbags, purses and wallets; Backpacks, book bags, sports bags, bum bags, wallets and handbags; Evening handbags; Fashion handbags; Fitted protective covers for handbags, briefcases, valises, suitcases, and briefcase-like portfolios; Gentlemen's handbags; Interchangeable decorative covers for accessorization purposes that are specially adapted to handbags; Leather handbags; Slouch handbags; Straps for handbags | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2020 |
| 025 | Belts for clothing; Belts made of leather; Belts of textile; Body suits for men and women; Bottoms as clothing for men and women; Coats for men and women; Fabric belts; Headwear for men and women; Hooded sweatshirts for men and women; Jackets for men and women; Pajamas for men and women; Pants for men and women; Shirts for men and women; Shoes for men and women; Shorts for men and women; Suspender belts; Sweaters for men and women; Sweatpants for men and women; Sweatshirts for men and women; T-shirts for men and women; Tops as clothing for men and women; Trousers for men and women; Waist belts; Woven shirts for men and women; Wrap belts for kimonos (datemaki) | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2021 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | GSS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SU - SUBSEQUENT FINAL E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | GSSF | SU - SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | SSFR | SOU - SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2020 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2020 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2020 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 9, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 21, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |