USPTO serial 88537703
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Jieyang Guangdong, CN
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Knife steels; Scissors; Spoons for tea; Tableware, namely, knives, forks and spoons; Tool holders; Biodegradable cutlery, namely, knives, forks and spoons; Bread knives; Ceramic knives; Chef knives; Compostable and biodegradable cutlery, namely, knives, spoons, forks; Disposable tableware, namely, knives, forks and spoons; Flatware, namely, forks, knives, and spoons; Folding knives; Forks and spoons being tableware; Forks being tableware; Fruit knives; Fruit carving knives; Household knives; Iced tea spoons; Kitchen knives; Knives being tableware; Knives, forks, and spoons being tableware; Non-electric fruit peelers; Plastic cutlery, namely, knives, forks, and spoons; Pocket knives; Razor knives; Spoons being tableware; Spoons made of precious metal being tableware; Stainless steel table knives, forks and spoons; Table forks; Table knives; Table knives, forks and spoons for babies; Table knives, forks and spoons of plastic; Utility knives; Vegetable knives; Weeding forks being hand tools; Working knives | ACTIVE | Feb 19, 2019 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |