USPTO serial 88537913
TWIN DRAGONS BAKING CO. DOUBLY DELICIOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, BRIDGET ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TWIN DRAGONS BAKING CO. DOUBLY DELICIOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT F. KRAMER
ROBERT F. KRAMER INNOVATE LEGAL3941 PARK DR SUITE 20-299EL DORADO HILLS, CA 95762UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sugar-free, low-carbohydrate, and high-fat food products, namely, sugar-free, low-carbohydrate, and high-fat baked goods in the nature of breads, cakes, brownies, cookies, biscotti, pizza crusts, ice cream sandwiches, sugar-free, low-carbohydrate, and high-fat ice cream, sugar-free, low-carbohydrate, and high-fat baking mixes for making breads, cakes and cookies, and sugar-free, low-carbohydrate, and high-fat confectionaries in the nature of in the nature of chocolate, cookie dough and candies, namely caramel, toffee, brittle, lollipops, and gummies | ACTIVE | Dec 16, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 13, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |