USPTO serial 88540106
DREAMME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINN, LAUREN DONGMI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DREAMME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Xiaole Zhang
250 W 34th StreetOne Penn Plaza, Suite 2015New York, NY 10119Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; Cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; Cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes; Facial cleansers; Hair conditioners; Hair dyes; Lipsticks; Make-up preparations; Make-up removing preparations; Perfumes; Skin whitening creams; Sunscreen preparations; Beauty masks; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic pencils; Cosmetic preparations for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; False eyelashes; Teeth whitening strips impregnated with teeth whitening preparations | ACTIVE | May 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2021 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 1, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |