USPTO serial 88540157
SRLEDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNING, LUKE CASH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SRLEDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GANG LUO
Gang Luo OLIFF PLCP.O. BOX 320850ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | LED and HID light fixtures, excluding lights for vehicles, light bars for vehicles and light emitting diode lights for automobiles and vehicle; LED candles; LED flashlights; LED lamps; LED landscape lights; LED light engines; LED lighting systems, namely, LED modules, power supplies, and wiring; LED luminaires; LED underwater lights; Light bulbs; Light reflectors; Lighting apparatus for sports arenas; Lighting apparatus for vehicles, excluding lights for vehicles, light bars for vehicles and light emitting diode lights for automobiles and vehicles; Lighting fixtures; Lighting installations; Lighting installations for air vehicles; Lighting installations for vehicles, excluding lights for vehicles, light bars for vehicles and light emitting diode lights for automobiles and vehicles; Lighting tracks; Lighting tubes; Ceiling light fittings; Ceiling lights; Diving lights; Electric torches for lighting; Fluorescent lighting tubes; Infrared lighting fixtures; Landscape lighting installations; Lanterns for lighting; Laser light projectors; LED light bulbs; LED light machines; Luminaires, using light emitting diodes (LEDs) as a light source, for street or roadway lighting; Miniature light bulbs; Outdoor lighting, namely, paver lights; Reading lights; Spot lights; Strip lighting for indoor use; Wall lights | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |