Drawing for PILOT VISION

USPTO serial 88543589

PILOT VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PILOT VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Vernon Smith

Andrew Vernon Smith SF BAY AREA PATENTS, LLC805 WATSON CANYON COURT SUITE 265SAN RAMON, CA 94582UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyeglasses, eyeglass frames, eyeglass lenses, contact lenses, eyewearACTIVE—
010Eye care kiosks, namely, interactive eye care kiosks comprised of eye testing machines and apparatusACTIVE—
044Optometric assistance services provided to eye care professionals or technicians, namely, assisting eye care professionals or technicians to perform non-surgical refraction eye exams and provide prescriptions optimized for quality of daytime distant vision and clarity of nighttime vision, for eye glasses and contacts, based on nonsurgical, optometric diagnosis of vision imperfections and higher order visual aberrations and assisting eye care professionals or technicians to generate refractive optical correction profiles optimized for quality of daytime distant vision and clarity of nighttime vision, for prescription eyeglasses, lenses and contact lenses; eye care kiosks, namely, shopping mall kiosks for providing optometry servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 23, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 13, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 18, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 18, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 26, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 24, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 24, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance