USPTO serial 88545667
BEILEDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, JOANNA Y
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEILEDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Zhongshan Yuanyu Gift Co., Ltd.
Zhongshan, Guangdong,, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Childbirth mattresses; Condoms; Electric acupuncture instruments; Feeding bottles; Medical imaging apparatus; Medical instruments, namely, orthopedic apparatus and instruments; Orthopedic belts; Respiratory masks for medical purposes; Sanitary masks for dust prevention for medical purposes; Soporific pillows for insomnia; Surgical implants comprised of artificial materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |