Drawing for THE HOUSE THAT ROLAND BUILT

USPTO serial 88546251

THE HOUSE THAT ROLAND BUILT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE HOUSE THAT ROLAND BUILT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Garner, TX Bar No. 24096876

Mary Garner, TX Bar No. 24096876 LEGALZOOM LEGAL SERVICES, LTD.101 N. BRAND BLVD., 11TH FLOORGLENDALE, CA 91203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio books in the field of biographies, auto-biographies, electronic music, and electronic dance music; Downloadable non-fiction books in the field of biographies, auto-biographies, electronic music, and electronic dance music; Musical recordings; Musical sound recordingsACTIVE—
016Printed books in the field of biographies, auto-biographies, electronic music, and electronic dance musicACTIVE—
035Arranging and conducting marketing promotional events for others; Providing marketing and promotion of special eventsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, the provision of continuing motion picture films featuring documentaries of electronic music, and electronic dance music delivered by, the internet; Music production servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 14, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance