USPTO serial 88549917
DURABOND PROTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYANT, ALEXANDRIA N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DURABOND PROTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scarborough, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A.W. Wong
David A.W. Wong BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 SOUTH MERIDIAN STREETINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Epoxy, polyurethane, acrylic and related chemical resin based coatings and systems for coating and protecting concrete, steel, wood and other similar construction and material substrates; coatings and systems for waterproofing, beautifying, protecting, dissipating, strengthening, fortifying, hardening, sealing, penetrating, coating, adhering, bonding, promoting longevity, increasing functional use, renewing, promoting ergonomic function, protection from bacteria, creating seamless surfaces, adding colour, and for decorating; admixtures, adhesives, cement blends and grouts for use in the construction industry; admixtures, adhesives, cement blends and grouts for fortifying, strengthening, bonding, hardening and advancing of various construction materials; coatings, systems, mixtures, adhesives, compositions and preparations; waterproofing chemical compositions for concrete and other building construction surfaces, including kits comprised of the components of the aforementioned chemical compositions for mixing by the user prior to use; epoxy coatings and urethane coatings for use on exterior floors, and for use on interior floors, namely, concrete industrial floors, concrete commercial floors and concrete residential floors, including kits comprised of the components of the aforementioned coatings for mixing by the user prior to use; cementitious urethanes for waterproofing floors and protecting concrete slabs below floors, including kits comprised of the components of the aforementioned waterproofing for mixing by the user prior to use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |