USPTO serial 88550255
THE SUCCESSFUL PROCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 9, 2020
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with THE SUCCESSFUL PROCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Land O Lakes, FL
Land O Lakes, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew T. Rissler
Andrew T. Rissler Patel & Almeida, P.C.16830 Ventura Blvd. #360Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting and business organization consultancy to the audiovisual industry in the fields of talent development, namely, talent management, business operations, business innovation process, business strategy, business sales and marketing, and business technology, namely, business strategic planning services in the technology industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | On-line electronic newsletters delivered by e-mail, providing on-line newsletters, on-line journals, namely, blogs, entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts, providing non-downloadable on-line videos, providing online non-downloadable electronic books, all for informational and educational business use for the audiovisual industry in the fields of talent development, namely, talent management, business operations, business innovation process, business strategy, business sales and marketing, and business technology, namely, business strategic planning services in the technology industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 7, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |