USPTO serial 88550600
MAINSTREET CLASSICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAINSTREET CLASSICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph W. Byrne
Joseph W. Byrne BOARDMAN & CLARK LLPONE SOUTH PINCKNEY STREET, SUITE 410MADISON, WI 53703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Board games and board game sets; table top board games and table top board game sets; table top games and table top game sets; table top game tables; chess games and chess sets; chess boards; checkers games and checkers sets; checker boards; Chinese checkers games and Chinese checkers sets; Chinese checker boards; backgammon games and backgammon sets; backgammon boards; cribbage games and cribbage sets; cribbage boards; dominoes; domino games and domino sets; dice games and dice sets; bag toss games and bag toss game sets; micro bag toss games and micro bag toss game sets; games, namely, table top bag toss games; table top bag toss game sets; games, namely, table top micro bag toss games; table top micro bag toss game sets; game tables; games, namely, billiards games; billiards sets; billiard tables; table top billiards games and table top billiards sets; table top billiard tables; pool tables; games, namely, table top pool games; table top pool game sets; table top pool tables; foosball games and foosball sets; foosball tables; table top foosball games and table top foosball sets; table top foosball tables; table hockey; table hockey games and table hockey sets; table hockey tables; games, namely, table top hockey games; table top hockey sets; table top hockey tables; air-powered hockey games and air-powered hockey sets; air-powered hockey tables; table top air-powered hockey games and table top air-powered hockey sets; table top air-powered hockey tables; game tables for use with gliding surface projectiles; table top game tables for use with gliding surface projectiles; table tennis games and table tennis sets; table tennis tables; table top tennis games and table top tennis sets; table top tennis tables; games, namely, lawn games and lawn game sets; and games, namely, yard games and yard game sets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 17, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |