Drawing for BLUE SHARK

USPTO serial 88550774

BLUE SHARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BLUE SHARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul Cosmovici

80 Broad Street, 5th Floor, #6377New York, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Cooling installations for water; Filters for drinking water; Ionization apparatus for the treatment of air; Mixer taps for water pipes; Water coolers; Water filtering apparatus; Water filters; Water ionizers; Water purifying apparatus; Water softening apparatus and installations; Water softening units; Water sterilizersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 27, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 24, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 24, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 23, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 23, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 23, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 23, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 18, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 11, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 24, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 24, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 24, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 23, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 11, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 2, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance