USPTO serial 88550951
STAR QUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STAR QUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent P. Johnson
Brent P. Johnson BERG HILL GREENLEAF RUSCITTI LLP1712 PEARL STREETBOULDER, CO 80302UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer game programs; Downloadable video game programs; Downloadable computer software for video games and for video games machines; Downloadable computer programs for creating video and computer games; Prerecorded video discs, hard discs, audio tapes, video cassettes, compact discs, all containing computer games; Prerecorded CD-ROMs containing computer games; Downloadable software for playing video, computer and on-line games; Downloadable software for enabling video, computer and on-line games to be run on multiple platforms; downloadable software for developing, designing, modifying and customizing video, computer and on-line games; Downloadable computer games for use on mobile phones; Downloadable electronic publications, namely, newsletters, books, periodicals, all in the field of computer games and entertainment provided online from databases for the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |