USPTO serial 88555214
CHILL MEDICATED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHILL MEDICATED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARSHA G GENTNER
MARSHA G GENTNER DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1301 K STREET NWSUITE 110WESTWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Face and body lotions; Massage oils; all of the foregoing solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |