Drawing for NEPTUNE

USPTO serial 88555296

NEPTUNE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DANTZLER, LAUREN ALEXANDRIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEPTUNE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Nolte Lackenbach Siegel1 Chase Rd.Scarsdale, NY 10583-4156UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Electronic cigarette liquid, not including essential oils, with extracts of industrial hemp derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis for use in liquids for electronic cigarettes and oral vaporizers for smoking purposesACTIVE—
035Online retail store featuring products containing extracts of industrial hemp with phytocannabinoids, namely, in the form of liquids for electronic cigarettes and oral vaporizers derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and not containing CBD; providing a website featuring consumer information about the endocannabinoid system and products containing extracts of industrial hemp and phytocannabinoidsACTIVE—
042Hemp product research services, namely, the discovery, characterization, and development of new products, new formulations and analytical techniques; all of the aforementioned featuring only hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 25, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 4, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 7, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 6, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 15, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 8, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 12, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2019AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2019PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance