Drawing for BRIGHTLOOM

USPTO serial 88555694

BRIGHTLOOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRIGHTLOOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bobby A. Ghajar

Bobby A. Ghajar COOLEY LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for managing retail stores, restaurants, and direct-to-consumer brands; Downloadable computer software for managing retail stores, restaurants, and direct-to-consumer brands; downloadable computer software for fulfilling retail orders and executing purchase transactions from an on-line website; Recorded data processing software; Downloadable data processing programs; downloadable mobile applications for managing retail stores, restaurants, and direct-to-consumer brands; Technology, particularly Computer hardware and recorded computer software to be used in physical and digital retail environments for managing orders, supplies, stock, and customer data; downloadable computer software that collects and reports personal identification data utilizing image recognition technology; computer hardware and software sold as a unit to be incorporated into retail store and restaurant fixtures that collects and reports data utilizing image recognition technology feature of software incorporated into shelving system hardware that collects and reports data utilizing image recognition technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2021NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 1, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 1, 2021DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 7, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 13, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 16, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 6, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 6, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 6, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 6, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 5, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 29, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance