USPTO serial 88556068
COST 4 LESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SULLIVAN, JOHN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COST 4 LESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Aquarium lights; Bread baking machines; Ceiling lights; Chandeliers; Cooking ovens; Deep fryers, electric; Drinking fountains; Electric autoclaves for cooking; Electric bread cookers; Electric food steamers; Electric hair dryers; Electric hot-water bottles; Electric light bulbs; Electric lighting fixtures; Electric rice steamers; Electric torches for lighting; Electric vegetable steamers; Fans for air conditioning apparatus; Filters for drinking water; Flashlights; Fluorescent lighting tubes; Incandescent light bulbs; Lamp bases; Lamp mantles; Lamps; Laundry dryers, electric; LED light bulbs; LED safety lamps; Light bulbs; Lighting fixtures; Microwave ovens; Refrigerating cabinets; Searchlights; String lights for festive decoration; Ultrasonic sterilizers for household purposes; Wall lights; Apparatus for filtering drinking water; Lamp casings; Safety lamps | ACTIVE | Jul 21, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2024 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 1, 2021 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |