Drawing for KAI MEN DA JI

USPTO serial 88556885

KAI MEN DA JI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SIMCOX, KYLE DUNCAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAI MEN DA JI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard H Newman

Richard H Newman NEWMAN LAW, LLC7435 S EASTERN AVE, SUITE 105-431LAS VEGAS, NV 89123UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment in the nature of online casino gaming services, namely, providing, through any computerized platform, casino games, slot games, games of chance, games of chance played as social games, play for fun games of chance, and online wagering games; online gaming services in the nature of providing online casino games, slot games, games of chance played as social games, real money wagering games, virtual currency wagering games, and online casino gaming services; Entertainment services, namely, casino gaming; Entertainment services, namely, providing games of chance via the Internet; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable electronic games; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable interactive games; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable game software; Providing online non-downloadable game software; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable game softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 20, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 19, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 19, 2020NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2020CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2020APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 18, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2020EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance