Drawing for KARTTLE

USPTO serial 88556984

KARTTLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HILL, JAMES T
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KARTTLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JONATHAN G. MORTON

LONG HUA6-3A1005,YI CHENG ZHONG XINSHENZHEN, GUANGDONG, 518000

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Barbecue grills; Bath screens; Electric candle warmers; Electric fans for personal use; Electric hair dryers; Heating inserts for pet beds; Household air cleaners; Portable toilets; Power-operated vaporizers for household purposes; Shower headsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2021MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 7, 2021ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 7, 2021OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 7, 2021OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 6, 2021OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 25, 2021CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 14, 2021EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2021ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 17, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2020RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Aug 21, 2020RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2020RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jul 31, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 8, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 20, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 20, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 20, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance