Drawing for COMO LE GUSTA... A USTED AZUQUITA PAL' CAFÉ

USPTO serial 88559047

COMO LE GUSTA... A USTED AZUQUITA PAL' CAFÉ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANGUBAT, ALEXANDER GEORGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMO LE GUSTA... A USTED AZUQUITA PAL' CAFÉ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maria Teresa Szendrey-Ramos

Maria Teresa Szendrey-Ramos MCCONNELL VALDES LLC270 MUNOZ RIVERA AVENUESAN JUAN, PR 00936UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Bonbons made of sugar, brown sugar, cakes of sugarbounded millet or popped rice (okoshi), coconut sugar, crystal sugar, crystal sugar pieces, dried sugared cakes of rice flour (rakugan), sugar wafers, sugar-coated coffee beans, sugar-coated hard caramels, sugared beans (amanatto), Sugarfree chewing gum, sugar-free chewing gum, sugarfree sweets, sugarless candies, sugarless chewing gum, sugarless sweets, sweet bean jam coated with sugared-bean based soft shell, synthetic sugarcane made from corn for food purposes, unrefined sugar, namely, evaporated sugar cane juice, confectionery made of sugar, cube sugar, granulated sugar, icing sugar, natural brown sugar, sugar, powdered sugar, sugar and sugar substitutes, sugar substitutes, white sugarACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 15, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 10, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 7, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2022EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 15, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 13, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 1, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 1, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 21, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 26, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 7, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance