USPTO serial 88559222
HOME GOODNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANGUBAT, ALEXANDER GEORGE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOME GOODNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson NOLTE LACKENBACH SIEGEL111 BROOK STREET, SUITE 101Scarsdale, NY 10583United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Section 44(e): Processed foods, namely, aseptic broths, aseptic soups, preparations for making soups, cereal-based food bars, almond milk, oat milk, almond milk-based beverages; all the aforesaid excluding frozen confections and ice cream Section 1(b): Processed foods, namely, processed fruits and vegetables, processed meat, vegetable preserves, fruit preserves, peanut butter, almond butter, jellies, jams, snack food dips, packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of potato chips, packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of vegetable based chips, packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of plantain chips, nut-based food bars, fruit-based replacement bars, soy milk, coconut-based beverages not being milk substitutes, staple foods, namely eggs, milk; all the aforesaid excluding frozen confections and ice cream | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Section 44(e): Crackers; cereal-based snack foods; rice-based snack foods; processed foods, namely, aseptic sauces, alimentary pasta, all the aforesaid excluding frozen confections and ice cream Section 1(b): Staple foods, namely, rice; processed foods, namely, processed grains, processed cereals, chutneys, breakfast cereals, processed grains, ketchup, relish, mustard salsa, pizza, pasta-based prepared meals, prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, prepared meals consisting primarily of vegetables, prepared meals consisting primarily of rice, prepared meals consisting primarily of potatoes, prepared meals consisting primarily of fish, prepared meals consisting primarily of seafood, prepared meals consisting primarily of eggs, packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of tortilla chips, packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of pita chips, packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of bagel chips, packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of rice chips, packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of popcorn, ready to eat cereal based food bars, granola-based snack bars, grain-based food bars, chocolate-based beverages, tea-based beverages, coffee-based beverages, prepared food kits composed of meat, poultry, fish, seafood, and/or vegetables, and/or rice, and/or pasta, and also including sauces or seasonings, ready for cooking and assembly as a meal, all the aforesaid excluding frozen confections and ice cream | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Section 44(e): Processed foods, namely, soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes, rice-based beverages not being milk substitutes, whey beverages not being milk substitutes, vegetable juices, aloe juice beverages, all the aforesaid excluding frozen confections and ice cream Section 1(b): Processed foods, namely, oat-based beverages not being milk substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Private Brands Consortium PBC Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Private Brands Consortium PBC Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named HOME GOODNESS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2024 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |