Drawing for PAPERMADE

USPTO serial 88560762

PAPERMADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEAN, JULES J.
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAPERMADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW D. BOCHNER

Jacob E. Lewin Stein Adler Dabah & Zelkowitz LLP1633 Broadway46th FloorNew York, NY 10019

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cup lids; drinking cups; Drinking cups sold with lids; Disposable cup and cup lid combinationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 18, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 18, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 8, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 24, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2021CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 2, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 2, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 4, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 4, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2020CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2020DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 23, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2020CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2020CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2020CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2020SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 4, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 11, 2020IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 11, 2020EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 11, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 6, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 31, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance